Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.
This text of Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty. (Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
JAMAL HATCHER, : No. 157 EM 2014 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2014, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED as improper
attempts at hybrid representation. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatcher-j-v-ct-com-pl-phila-cty-pa-2014.