Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 21, 2014
Docket157 EM 2014
StatusPublished

This text of Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty. (Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

JAMAL HATCHER, : No. 157 EM 2014 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2014, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED as improper

attempts at hybrid representation. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hatcher, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatcher-j-v-ct-com-pl-phila-cty-pa-2014.