Hatch v. Reliance Insurance

474 U.S. 1048, 106 S. Ct. 782, 88 L. Ed. 2d 761, 54 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2273
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 13, 1986
DocketNo. 85-641
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 474 U.S. 1048 (Hatch v. Reliance Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hatch v. Reliance Insurance, 474 U.S. 1048, 106 S. Ct. 782, 88 L. Ed. 2d 761, 54 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2273 (1986).

Opinion

ante, p. 1021. Motion of respondent for award of damages granted, and damages in the amount of $500 are awarded pursuant to this Court’s Rule 49.2.

Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Stevens dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Amendment to Rule 39
500 U.S. 13 (Supreme Court, 1991)
In re Amendment to Rule 39
134 F.R.D. 493 (S.D. Georgia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 U.S. 1048, 106 S. Ct. 782, 88 L. Ed. 2d 761, 54 U.S.L.W. 3460, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatch-v-reliance-insurance-scotus-1986.