Hatch v. . Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co.
114 N.E. 1068, 219 N.Y. 650, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 995
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Not voting: Cardozo, J. Not sitting: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hatch v. . Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co., 114 N.E. 1068, 219 N.Y. 650, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 995 (N.Y. 1916).
114 N.E. 1068 (Hatch v. . Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woloszynowski v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co.
172 N.E. 471 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Woloszynowski v. New York Central Railroad
254 N.Y. 206 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)