Hatch v. Kurtzweil

87 N.W. 1082, 112 Wis. 231, 1901 Wisc. LEXIS 100
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided November 29, 1901·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bardeen, J.

The case of Wood v. Blythe, 42 Wis. 300, decides that an order of the circuit court, after judgment, granting or refusing an extension of the time for settling a bill of exceptions, does not affect any substantial right and is not appealable. The fact that the order in this case allows the plaintiff to file exceptions to the findings does not alter the situation. The authority of the court in both instances is given by sec. 2831, Stats. 1898.

Under the rule laid down in the case above mentioned, there is nothing for us to do but to dismiss the appeal..

By the Court.— So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hatch v. Kurtzweil, 87 N.W. 1082, 112 Wis. 231, 1901 Wisc. LEXIS 100 (Wis. 1901).

87 N.W. 1082 (Hatch v. Kurtzweil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rabinowitz v. Crabtree
145 N.W. 1055 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)
Sly v. Village of Kilbourn City
128 N.W. 872 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1910)