Hasty v. State
This text of 394 S.E.2d 800 (Hasty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Jeremy Hasty, was convicted of underage possession of alcohol. There is no transcript of the trial or stipulation of the evidence, but Hasty asserts that he was arrested after being required to submit to an alcosensor test in a McDonald’s parking lot, even though he had not been driving the car he was in. Hasty represented himself at all stages of the trial proceedings, and filed a motion to suppress the evidence. On appeal, he contends that the trial court failed to address that motion.
In the absence of a transcript, we cannot consider enumerations of error concerning the evidence or proceedings at trial. Dean v. State, 188 Ga. App. 128 (372 SE2d 286) (1988). Accordingly, we must assume that the motion to suppress received a proper disposition during the trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
394 S.E.2d 800, 195 Ga. App. 427, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hasty-v-state-gactapp-1990.