Hasty v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Hasty v. Southern Railway Co.

137 S.E. 927, 140 S.C. 49, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 18

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 11, 1927

Docket12197

StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 927 (Hasty v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hasty v. Southern Railway Co., 137 S.E. 927, 140 S.C. 49, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 18 (S.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEB Justice Watts.

This, case comes before the Court by way of an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge M. S. Whaley, Judge of the Richland County Court, dated May 10, 1926, overruling the demurrer to the complaint interposed by the defendant appellant. It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the same question raised in this case was decided in favor of the defendant appellant herein in the case of *50 Kershaw Motor Co. v. Southern Railway Co. (August 16, 1926), 136 S. C., 377; 134 S. E., 377; now, on motion of Frank G. Tompkins, attorney for defendant appellant, and by and with the consent of E. J. Best and J. B. McLauchlin, attorneys for plaintiff respondent, it is ordered that the order of his Honor, Judge M. S. Whaley, be reversed, and the demurrer be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEB Justice Watts.

This, case comes before the Court by way of an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge M. S. Whaley, Judge of the Richland County Court, dated May 10, 1926, overruling the demurrer to the complaint interposed by the defendant appellant. It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the same question raised in this case was decided in favor of the defendant appellant herein in the case of *50 Kershaw Motor Co. v. Southern Railway Co. (August 16, 1926), 136 S. C., 377; 134 S. E., 377; now, on motion of Frank G. Tompkins, attorney for defendant appellant, and by and with the consent of E. J. Best and J. B. McLauchlin, attorneys for plaintiff respondent, it is ordered that the order of his Honor, Judge M. S. Whaley, be reversed, and the demurrer be sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S.E. 927, 140 S.C. 49, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hasty-v-southern-railway-co-sc-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack