Hasty v. Southern Railway Co.

137 S.E. 927, 140 S.C. 49, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 18
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 11, 1927·No. 12197·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEB Justice Watts.

This, case comes before the Court by way of an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge M. S. Whaley, Judge of the Richland County Court, dated May 10, 1926, overruling the demurrer to the complaint interposed by the defendant appellant. It appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the same question raised in this case was decided in favor of the defendant appellant herein in the case of *50 Kershaw Motor Co. v. Southern Railway Co. (August 16, 1926), 136 S. C., 377; 134 S. E., 377; now, on motion of Frank G. Tompkins, attorney for defendant appellant, and by and with the consent of E. J. Best and J. B. McLauchlin, attorneys for plaintiff respondent, it is ordered that the order of his Honor, Judge M. S. Whaley, be reversed, and the demurrer be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hasty v. Southern Railway Co., 137 S.E. 927, 140 S.C. 49, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 18 (S.C. 1927).

137 S.E. 927 (Hasty v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kershaw Motor Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.
134 S.E. 377 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)