Hastings v. Wilbur

E.D. Arkansas

Hastings v. Wilbur

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided February 1, 2022·No. 3:20-cv-00160·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

STEVEN HASTINGS. ADC #171672 PLAINTIFF

No. 3:20-cv-160-DPM

ALEC J. WILBUR, Corrections Sergeant, North Central Unit, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER Hastings’s appeal, Doc. 390, is denied. FED R. CIv. P. 72(a). Magistrate Judge Volpe didn’t clearly err or misapply the law in denying the most recent motion for appointed counsel. Doc. 386 & 387; Plummer v. Grimes, 87 F.3d 1032, 1033 (8th Cir. 1996). Hastings must continue doing his best; and the Court will continue to liberally construe Hastings’s pro se filings. So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge Hpvary 2022~

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

STEVEN HASTINGS. ADC #171672 PLAINTIFF

No. 3:20-cv-160-DPM

ALEC J. WILBUR, Corrections Sergeant, North Central Unit, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER Hastings’s appeal, Doc. 390, is denied. FED R. CIv. P. 72(a). Magistrate Judge Volpe didn’t clearly err or misapply the law in denying the most recent motion for appointed counsel. Doc. 386 & 387; Plummer v. Grimes, 87 F.3d 1032, 1033 (8th Cir. 1996). Hastings must continue doing his best; and the Court will continue to liberally construe Hastings’s pro se filings. So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge Hpvary 2022~

Hastings v. Wilbur, (E.D. Ark. 2022).

Pincite

Hastings v. Wilbur (Hastings v. Wilbur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related