Hastings v. State
This text of 899 So. 2d 458 (Hastings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jeffrey R. HASTINGS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jeffrey R. Hastings, Okeechobee, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant's seeking post-sentencing jail credit, administratively, from the Department of Corrections. See § 921.161(1), Fla. Stat.; Washington v. State, 662 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Reynolds v. State, 590 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Kenon v. State, 616 So.2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
FARMER, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
899 So. 2d 458, 2005 WL 768451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hastings-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.