Hastings v. State

567 So. 2d 954, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7051, 1990 WL 133812
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 19, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2855
StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 954 (Hastings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hastings v. State, 567 So. 2d 954, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7051, 1990 WL 133812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed, as the motion was untimely filed in the trial court.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 So. 2d 954, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7051, 1990 WL 133812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hastings-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.