Hastings v. State

249 So. 2d 776, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 12, 1971
DocketNo. 70-353
StatusPublished

This text of 249 So. 2d 776 (Hastings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hastings v. State, 249 So. 2d 776, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs and record on appeal which have been given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence of the trial court is affirmed on the authority of Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654, and Winkfield v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 209 So.2d 468.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winkfield v. State
209 So. 2d 468 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Williams v. State
110 So. 2d 654 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 So. 2d 776, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hastings-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.