Hastings v. Parker

47 N.E. 194, 168 Mass. 445, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 260
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 21, 1897·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Field, C. J.

The only exception is to the refusal of the court to order the respondents to file an answer to the petition.

The St. 1895, c. 234, does not require the respondent to file an answer, and there is no rule of the Superior Court that in terms requires an answer to such a petition. Such a petition, like a petition for a writ of review, never has been treated as an action at law in which the respondent may be defaulted if he does not file an answer, and the proceedings are not within the provisions of Pub. Sts. c. 167, §§ 13-29, and §§ 45-47.

It is unnecessary to consider whether the court has not the power to order an answer to be filed to such a petition if it seems to the court necessary or desirable. The petitioner has no right to require this to be done.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hastings v. Parker, 47 N.E. 194, 168 Mass. 445, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 260 (Mass. 1897).

47 N.E. 194 (Hastings v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hendrick v. West Roxbury Co-operative Bank
92 N.E.2d 238 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Lynch v. Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
13 N.E.2d 611 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Thomajanian v. Odabshian
172 N.E. 232 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Luman v. Hill
256 P. 339 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1927)
Wrinn v. Sellers
252 Mass. 423 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Maker v. Bouthier
242 Mass. 20 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Marsch v. Southern New England Railroad
126 N.E. 519 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)