Hastings v. FCA US, LLC

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

LIAM HASTINGS, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of NICOLAS HASTINGS and SYDNEY HASTINGS, both Minors; and TRENTON HASTINGS, Individually PLAINTIFFS

v. Case No. 4:19-cv-4067

FCA US LLC f/k/a/ CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC f/k/a CHRYSLER LLC f/k/a/ DAIMLER CHRYSLER f/k/a CHRYSLER CORPORATION DEFENDANT

ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice. (ECF No. 133). No response is necessary. The parties have settled all issues in this case and ask for dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant FCA US LLC. An action or claim may be dismissed by court order, on terms the Court considers proper. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). “Voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) should not be granted if a party will be prejudiced by the dismissal.” Adams v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 863 F.3d 1069, 1079 (8th Cir. 2017). Good cause exists for the motion (ECF No. 133), which is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant FCA US LLC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. No other claims remain, so the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 25th day of July, 2022. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge