Hastings Mut. Ins. v. Halatek
This text of 881 N.E.2d 1259 (Hastings Mut. Ins. v. Halatek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mahoning App. No. 06-MA-102, 2007-Ohio-6923. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On February 26, 2008, appellee Erie Insurance Company filed a memorandum in response to a memorandum in support of jurisdiction filed on January 25, 2008. Sup.Ct.Prac.R III(2)(A) requires a memorandum in response to be filed with the Supreme Court within 30 days after the memorandum in support of jurisdiction. In order to timely file a memorandum in response to a memorandum in support of jurisdiction filed on January 25, 2008, the memorandum in response must have been filed no later than February 25, 2008.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered, sua sponte, that appellee Erie Insurance Company’s memorandum in response is stricken as prohibited by Sup.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(D).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
881 N.E.2d 1259, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hastings-mut-ins-v-halatek-ohio-2008.