Hastings Gardens Owners Corp. v. Iagallo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hastings Gardens Owners Corp. v. Iagallo

182 A.D.2d 822

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 182 A.D.2d 822 (Hastings Gardens Owners Corp. v. Iagallo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hastings Gardens Owners Corp. v. Iagallo, 182 A.D.2d 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated proceedings to review assessments of the petitioner’s real property for the tax years 1984 through 1987, Gennaro Iagallo and the Board of Assessment Review of the Town of Greenburgh appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), entered November 13, 1989, as utilized the straight line method of capitalization to calculate the assessments.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There was ample evidence in the record to support the Supreme Court’s determination to utilize the straight line method in computing the capitalization rate. Eiber, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated proceedings to review assessments of the petitioner’s real property for the tax years 1984 through 1987, Gennaro Iagallo and the Board of Assessment Review of the Town of Greenburgh appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), entered November 13, 1989, as utilized the straight line method of capitalization to calculate the assessments.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There was ample evidence in the record to support the Supreme Court’s determination to utilize the straight line method in computing the capitalization rate. Eiber, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A.D.2d 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hastings-gardens-owners-corp-v-iagallo-nyappdiv-1992.