Hast v. Territory

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hast v. Territory

1909 OK CR 171, 105 P. 1118, 3 Okla. Crim. 339, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 252

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 20, 1909

DocketNo. 1502, Okla. Ter.

StatusPublished

This text of 1909 OK CR 171 (Hast v. Territory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hast v. Territory, 1909 OK CR 171, 105 P. 1118, 3 Okla. Crim. 339, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 252 (Okla. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The records of the clerk of this court show that on April 20, 1904, a petition in error, with ease-made attached, in the above-entitled cause, ‘ was filed in the ■ Supreme *340 court of the territory of Oklahoma, and that upon the admission of Oklahoma, as a state said cause was transferred to the Supreme Court of the state of Oklahoma. Upon the organization of the Criminal Court of Appeals, as directed by statute, the Supreme Court transferred said cause to this, court; but no record, petition in error, case-made, or -briefs have ever been transferred to this court. No appearance has ever been made in this court on behalf of plaintiff in error,., although said cause has been assigned and continued from term to term since the organization of this court.. It appearing that plaintiff in error has abandoned his appeal, for the reasons stated, the appeal is, on the motion of Assistant Attorney General, Charles L. Moore, dismissed for want of prosecution, with direction to the district court of Pottawatomie county to cause the judgment and sentence to be carried into execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

The records of the clerk of this court show that on April 20, 1904, a petition in error, with ease-made attached, in the above-entitled cause, ‘ was filed in the ■ Supreme *340 court of the territory of Oklahoma, and that upon the admission of Oklahoma, as a state said cause was transferred to the Supreme Court of the state of Oklahoma. Upon the organization of the Criminal Court of Appeals, as directed by statute, the Supreme Court transferred said cause to this, court; but no record, petition in error, case-made, or -briefs have ever been transferred to this court. No appearance has ever been made in this court on behalf of plaintiff in error,., although said cause has been assigned and continued from term to term since the organization of this court.. It appearing that plaintiff in error has abandoned his appeal, for the reasons stated, the appeal is, on the motion of Assistant Attorney General, Charles L. Moore, dismissed for want of prosecution, with direction to the district court of Pottawatomie county to cause the judgment and sentence to be carried into execution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1909 OK CR 171, 105 P. 1118, 3 Okla. Crim. 339, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hast-v-territory-oklacrimapp-1909.