Hassler v. Connolly
82 F.2d 1010, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3209
This text of 82 F.2d 1010 (Hassler v. Connolly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hassler v. Connolly, 82 F.2d 1010, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3209 (3d Cir. 1936).
Opinion
The facts and circumstances connected with this equity receivership, are voluminous and involved. The claim of the appellant for services was fully considered by the court below. It has had careful consideration given it by this court, with the result we find no error in the District Court’s refusal of appellant’s claim. So holding, its refusal is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
82 F.2d 1010, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hassler-v-connolly-ca3-1936.