Hassin v. Brodlieb

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 16, 2020
Docket2020 NYSlipOp 50062(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Hassin v. Brodlieb (Hassin v. Brodlieb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hassin v. Brodlieb, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion



Bonnie Hassin and Mark Hassin, Respondents,

against

Oliver Brodlieb, Defendant, and East Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge, Appellant.


Richard M. Hendler of counsel, for appellant. Bonnie Hassin and Mark Hassin, respondents pro se.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, Second District (Joseph B. Girardi, J.), entered March 20, 2017. The order denied a motion by defendant East Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge to vacate so much of a judgment of that court entered December 7, 2016 as was against it.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs, the motion by defendant East Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge to vacate so much of the judgment as was entered against it is granted and the matter is remitted to the District Court for all further proceedings.

In this small claims action to recover damages for breach of warranty, East Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge (defendant) appeals from an order of the District Court denying its motion to vacate so much of a judgment as was entered against it, awarding plaintiffs the principal sum of $5,000.

In support of defendant's motion, it was alleged that counsel for defendant had advised the clerk that he had a prior engagement in another court, but the court had proceeded with the "trial" in his absence and allowed the service manager, who had appeared on behalf of defendant, to testify. At the "trial," the service manager also informed the court that he was waiting for counsel, who was appearing in another courtroom.

Under the circumstances presented, we find that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's motion to vacate the judgment (see Abate v Long, 261 AD2d 252 [1999]; Zatorski v Klein, 11 AD2d 790 [1960]).

Accordingly, the order is reversed, the motion by defendant East Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge to vacate so much of the judgment as was entered against it is granted and the matter is remitted to the District Court for all further proceedings.

ADAMS, P.J., TOLBERT and GARGUILO, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: January 16, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zatorski v. Klein
11 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Abate v. Long
261 A.D.2d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hassin v. Brodlieb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hassin-v-brodlieb-nyappterm-2020.