Hassfurter v. Garrison

210 A.D. 802
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Award reversed and claim remitted to the State Industrial Board, with costs to the appellant against said Board to abide the event. Since there is not a loss of two or more fingers or of two or more phalanges of two or more fingers compensation may not be proportioned to the loss of use of the hand. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 3, q.) * Compensation should be awarded under section 15, subdivisions 3, i, j, 1 and s,* for the total loss of the second finger and for the proportionate loss of use of the third and fourth fingers, of each of which claimant has suffered a permanent partial loss of use. All concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hassfurter v. Garrison, 210 A.D. 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

210 A.D. 802 (Hassfurter v. Garrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Rounds v. Davis Furniture Co.
165 N.E. 827 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)