Hassfurter v. Garrison
210 A.D. 802
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Award reversed and claim remitted to the State Industrial Board, with costs to the appellant against said Board to abide the event. Since there is not a loss of two or more fingers or of two or more phalanges of two or more fingers compensation may not be proportioned to the loss of use of the hand. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 3, q.)
See Workmen’s Compensation Law of 1922, g 15, subd. 3, 1HÍ i, j.- 1, 9, s, respectively.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hassfurter v. Garrison, 210 A.D. 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
210 A.D. 802 (Hassfurter v. Garrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Rounds v. Davis Furniture Co.
165 N.E. 827 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)