Hassett v. Archdiocese of Detroit
712 N.W.2d 729, 474 Mich. 1134, 2006 WL 1174106
This text of 712 N.W.2d 729 (Hassett v. Archdiocese of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hassett v. Archdiocese of Detroit, 712 N.W.2d 729, 474 Mich. 1134, 2006 WL 1174106 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Timothy HASSETT, John Doe, William Johnson, a/k/a "Golf Shoes" Johnson, and John Fruciano, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ARCHDIOCESE OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
712 N.W.2d 729, 474 Mich. 1134, 2006 WL 1174106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hassett-v-archdiocese-of-detroit-mich-2006.