Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Hassell v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Hassell v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co.

506 S.W.2d 727, 1974 Tex. App. LEXIS 2135
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 1974
Docket5317
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 506 S.W.2d 727 (Hassell v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hassell v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co., 506 S.W.2d 727, 1974 Tex. App. LEXIS 2135 (Tex. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from summary judgment they take nothing in suit for damages against defendant for alleged interference with the business relationship between plaintiffs and a client.

Plaintiffs appeal on one point contending the court erred in rendering summary judgment “since appellee is liable for the wrongful acts of Robert J. Lankford * * committed while he was acting within the scope of his authority; and for the additional reason that Lankford conspired with an officer and employee of appellee to accomplish such wrongful act.”

The judgment recites among other matters that the trial court considered the depositions on file. No depositions have been brought forward as a part of the record on appeal, which is plaintiffs’ (appellants) burden.

We cannot decide from the incomplete record before us that the judgment is erroneous. It is presumed the omitted depositions establish the correctness of the judgment. Alexander v. Bank of American National Trust and Savings Assn., Tex.Civ.App., Er.Ref., 401 S.W.2d *728 688; Wood v. Indiana Lumbermen’s Mut. Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., NRE, 477 S.W.2d 657.

Appellants’ point is overruled.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCarty-Hull Cigar Co., Inc. D/B/A McCarty-Hull, Inc. Basin Candy and Tobacco Company Berry-Barnett Grocery Company, Inc. B & G Tobacco & Candy Company, Inc. B & G Tobacco & Candy Company, Inc. D/B/A B & G Pasadena Wholesale v. Bob Bullock, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas Ann W. Richards, Treasurer of the State of Texas And Jim Mattox, Attorney General of the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994
Johnson v. Walker
824 S.W.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.
793 S.W.2d 670 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)
Wolf v. Fernandez
733 S.W.2d 695 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Olivares v. Cauthorn
717 S.W.2d 431 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Arnold v. INA of Texas
715 S.W.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Cliff Management Corp. v. Lovell
695 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Gallery Datsun, Inc. v. Metcalf
630 S.W.2d 853 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Foster v. Hubbard Independent School District
619 S.W.2d 607 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
DeBell v. Texas General Realty, Inc.
609 S.W.2d 892 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Steele v. City of Houston
577 S.W.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Newsom v. Starkey
541 S.W.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Gay v. City of Hillsboro
536 S.W.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Ashford v. State
515 S.W.2d 758 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Archer v. Storm Nursery, Inc.
512 S.W.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 S.W.2d 727, 1974 Tex. App. LEXIS 2135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hassell-v-new-england-mutual-life-insurance-co-texapp-1974.