Hassan v. Quigley
This text of 43 P. 713 (Hassan v. Quigley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case judgment was entered in the district court in favor of plaintiff. The case was tried before Associate Justice Hunt, who was at that time district judge of the First district. This fact, under the statute, disqualifies him from participating in the hearing and decision in this court. The case here was argued before Chief Justice Pernberton and Associate Justice De Witt. Upon consultation by the justices who heard the case, it is found that a disagreement exists between them as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed. Owing to this fact, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, without an opinion by this court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 P. 713, 17 Mont. 493, 1896 Mont. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hassan-v-quigley-mont-1896.