Hassan v. Deutsche Bank AG

Second Circuit

Hassan v. Deutsche Bank AG

336 F. App'x 21

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 2009

DocketNo. 08-1944-cv

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 336 F. App'x 21 (Hassan v. Deutsche Bank AG) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hassan v. Deutsche Bank AG, 336 F. App'x 21 (2d Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants Tariq Hassan and The Buying Triangle, LLC appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Castel, J.) that granted summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees Deutsche Bank AG and Jeffrey Baer. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, as well as with the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

We review the District Court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, construing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant and resolving all ambiguities against the movant. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). We affirm for substantially the same reasons as those stated by Judge Castel in his thoughtful opinion.

The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants Tariq Hassan and The Buying Triangle, LLC appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Castel, J.) that granted summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees Deutsche Bank AG and Jeffrey Baer. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, as well as with the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

We review the District Court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, construing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant and resolving all ambiguities against the movant. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). We affirm for substantially the same reasons as those stated by Judge Castel in his thoughtful opinion.

The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

336 F. App'x 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hassan-v-deutsche-bank-ag-ca2-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack