Hassan v. Bell

Fourth Circuit

Hassan v. Bell

56 F. App'x 166

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2003·No. No. 02-2150·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mustafa S. Hassan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Hassan claims the Defendants violated his various constitutional and statutory rights based on their roles in a state action that concluded adversely to him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Leonard v. Swthard, 927 F.2d 168, 169-70 (4th Cir. 1991). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. See Hassan v. Bell, No. CA-02-1136-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 27, 2002; entered Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mustafa S. Hassan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Hassan claims the Defendants violated his various constitutional and statutory rights based on their roles in a state action that concluded adversely to him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Leonard v. Swthard, 927 F.2d 168, 169-70 (4th Cir. 1991). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. See Hassan v. Bell, No. CA-02-1136-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 27, 2002; entered Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hassan v. Bell, 56 F. App'x 166 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

56 F. App'x 166 (Hassan v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related