Hass v. State
This text of 31 S.E.2d 432 (Hass v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the offense of burglary. His motion for a new trial, containing the general grounds only, was overruled; and that judgment is assigned as error. The evidence, direct and circumstantial, while not altogether satisfactory, was sufficient to show the corpus delicti, and to authorize the jury ’to find that the defendant was present at the commission of the crime and participated therein as a principal. The denial of a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 S.E.2d 432, 71 Ga. App. 552, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hass-v-state-gactapp-1944.