Haspil v. State Department of Transportation

374 So. 2d 633, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15717
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 1979
DocketNo. 77-1691
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 374 So. 2d 633 (Haspil v. State Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haspil v. State Department of Transportation, 374 So. 2d 633, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15717 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, bring this appeal from an order entered by the trial court granting appellees’, defendants below, motions for summary judgment in an action for active negligence involving appellees’ alleged failure to warn appellants of a known hazardous condition on the westbound lanes of the Coral Way overpass of the Florida Turnpike extension and their failure to repair, replace, and maintain any warning apparatus at this location after knowing of the probability of injury. The record reflects that appellees’ motions for summary judgment were granted by the trial court on the grounds of sovereign immunity and no special duty owed to appellants. At the time these motions were granted, the trial court did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Commercial Carrier Corporation v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979); or our decision in Welsh v. Metropolitan Dade County, 366 So.2d 518 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Pursuant to the reasoning propounded in these recent cases, in our opinion, the trial court erred in granting appel-lees’ motions for summary judgment on the grounds set forth above. Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and the authorities cited herein. Upon remand, the trial court may properly entertain any appropriate motions by the parties for summary judgment or other relief on other grounds, e. g., no duty to maintain the roadway, etc.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CSX Transp., Inc. v. Pasco County
660 So. 2d 757 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Camillo v. DEPT. OF TRANSP., STATE OF FLA.
546 So. 2d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 So. 2d 633, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haspil-v-state-department-of-transportation-fladistctapp-1979.