Haspel v. O'Brien
This text of 32 Pa. Super. 147 (Haspel v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A reconsideration of the substantial question raised on these appeals, with the aid of the argument of the appellant’s counsel, has failed to convince us that our rulings in Martin v. Greenwood, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 245, and Oil City B. & L. [148]*148Assn. v. Shanfelter, 29 Pa. Superior Ct. 251, were erroneous, and ought to be overruled. Nor can we see that any useful purpose would be served by .further discussion of the question on our part.
The order appealed from in each of the foregoing cases is affirmed at the appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Pa. Super. 147, 1906 Pa. Super. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haspel-v-obrien-pasuperct-1906.