Haspel Brothers, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Haspel Brothers, Inc. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 172, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 527

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 30, 1948

DocketNo. 52442; protests 61767-K/12392 and 61766-K/12385 (New Orleans)

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Cust. Ct. 172 (Haspel Brothers, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haspel Brothers, Inc. v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 172, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 527 (cusc 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the [173]*173holding in John Barr v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See John Barr v. United States, 324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the [173]*173holding in John Barr v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See John Barr v. United States, 324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Cust. Ct. 172, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haspel-brothers-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack