Hasner v. Patterson

28 N.W. 493, 70 Iowa 681
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 17, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 28 N.W. 493 (Hasner v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hasner v. Patterson, 28 N.W. 493, 70 Iowa 681 (iowa 1886).

Opinion

Adaihs, Ci-i. J.

This case cannot be tried de novo, for the reason that the abstract does not purport to contain all the evidence. The abstract, it is true, contains a certificate by the judge as to the evidence upon which the case was tried; but such certificate cannot show that the abstract contains all the evidence. The defendant made a motion for a new trial, based upon four different grounds. The motion was overruled, and the defendant assigns the overruling of the motion as error. But the assignment is too general. We have frequently held that where a motion for a new trial is based [682]*682upon several grounds, it is not sufficient to assign as error that the court erred in overruling the motion. The defendant complains that the court erred in admitting certain evidence, but in an equity case such error, if any, does not constitute a ground of reversal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huss v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
85 N.W. 627 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1901)
Dairy v. Iowa Central Railway Co.
84 N.W. 688 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)
Clapp v. Greenlee
69 N.W. 1049 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Duncombe v. Powers
39 N.W. 261 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 N.W. 493, 70 Iowa 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hasner-v-patterson-iowa-1886.