Hasner v. Patterson

28 N.W. 493, 70 Iowa 681
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 17, 1886·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Adaihs, Ci-i. J.

This case cannot be tried de novo, for the reason that the abstract does not purport to contain all the evidence. The abstract, it is true, contains a certificate by the judge as to the evidence upon which the case was tried; but such certificate cannot show that the abstract contains all the evidence. The defendant made a motion for a new trial, based upon four different grounds. The motion was overruled, and the defendant assigns the overruling of the motion as error. But the assignment is too general. We have frequently held that where a motion for a new trial is based [682] upon several grounds, it is not sufficient to assign as error that the court erred in overruling the motion. The defendant complains that the court erred in admitting certain evidence, but in an equity case such error, if any, does not constitute a ground of reversal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hasner v. Patterson, 28 N.W. 493, 70 Iowa 681 (iowa 1886).

28 N.W. 493 (Hasner v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huss v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
85 N.W. 627 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1901)
Dairy v. Iowa Central Railway Co.
84 N.W. 688 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)
Clapp v. Greenlee
69 N.W. 1049 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Duncombe v. Powers
39 N.W. 261 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1888)