Haslett v. Ivie

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Haslett v. Ivie

164 S.E. 90, 45 Ga. App. 171, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 212

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 29, 1932

Docket21875

StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.E. 90 (Haslett v. Ivie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haslett v. Ivie, 164 S.E. 90, 45 Ga. App. 171, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 212 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The verdict for the plaintiff in this case, who sued for damages on account of personal injuries sustained as the result of a collision between defendant's truck and plaintiff's mail wagon, was authorized by the evidence; and the four special grounds of the motion for a new trial, averring error in certain excerpts from the court’s charge, are without merit. The motion was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The verdict for the plaintiff in this case, who sued for damages on account of personal injuries sustained as the result of a collision between defendant's truck and plaintiff's mail wagon, was authorized by the evidence; and the four special grounds of the motion for a new trial, averring error in certain excerpts from the court’s charge, are without merit. The motion was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 S.E. 90, 45 Ga. App. 171, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haslett-v-ivie-gactapp-1932.