Hasler v. County of Oneida

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hasler v. County of Oneida

259 A.D. 1054, 21 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7944

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 1940·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for dis[1055]*1055missal of the complaint on the ground that no negligence of the appellant is shown and that the sole cause of the accident was the negligence of the driver of the car in which the plaintiffs were riding. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for dis[1055]*1055missal of the complaint on the ground that no negligence of the appellant is shown and that the sole cause of the accident was the negligence of the driver of the car in which the plaintiffs were riding. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCum, JJ.

Hasler v. County of Oneida, 259 A.D. 1054, 21 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 1054 (Hasler v. County of Oneida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.