Hasler v. County of Oneida
This text of 259 A.D. 1054 (Hasler v. County of Oneida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for dis[1055]*1055missal of the complaint on the ground that no negligence of the appellant is shown and that the sole cause of the accident was the negligence of the driver of the car in which the plaintiffs were riding. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCum, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1054, 21 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hasler-v-county-of-oneida-nyappdiv-1940.