Haslam v. Paulsen

Utah Supreme Court

Haslam v. Paulsen

389 P.2d 736, 15 Utah 2d 185, 1964 Utah LEXIS 218

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 27, 1964

Docket9938

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 389 P.2d 736 (Haslam v. Paulsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haslam v. Paulsen, 389 P.2d 736, 15 Utah 2d 185, 1964 Utah LEXIS 218 (Utah 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

CROCKETT, Justice.

In an action for personal injury the plaintiff obtained a verdict for $50,000 general and $558.80 special damages. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion *186 for'a new trial, from which the plaintiff seeks to appeal.

The right of appeal is from final judgments. Utah Const. Art. VIII, Sec. 9; Rule 72(a), U.R.C.P. The order granting a new trial is not a final judgment, it hut sets aside the verdict and places the parties in the same position as if there had been no previous trial. White v. Pease, 15 Utah 170, 49 P. 416; Bear River Valley Orchard Company v. Hanley, 15 Utah 506, 50 P. 611; Klinge v. Southern Pacific Company, 89 Utah 284, 57 P.2d 367, 105 A.L.R. 204. While we agree that the trial court cannot, without any reason whatsoever, grant such a motion upon mere whim or caprice, it nevertheless has a wide latitude of discretion with respect thereto in conformity with the general supervisory powers which it necessarily has over the verdicts of juries in the interest of the administration of justice. If such power is in fact exercised arbitrarily, the proper redress is either in a petition for interlocutory appeal, which may be granted in a proper case (Rule 72(b), U.R.C.P.); or the claimed error can be preserved and reviewed if necessary upon the final outcome of the case. See King v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 117 Utah 40, 212 P.2d 692.

The case is remanded for trial. Costs to defendants (respondents).

HENRIOD, C. J., and McDONOUGH,, CALLISTER, and- WADE, ,JJ„ concur. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CROCKETT, Justice.

In an action for personal injury the plaintiff obtained a verdict for $50,000 general and $558.80 special damages. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion *186 for'a new trial, from which the plaintiff seeks to appeal.

The right of appeal is from final judgments. Utah Const. Art. VIII, Sec. 9; Rule 72(a), U.R.C.P. The order granting a new trial is not a final judgment, it hut sets aside the verdict and places the parties in the same position as if there had been no previous trial. White v. Pease, 15 Utah 170, 49 P. 416; Bear River Valley Orchard Company v. Hanley, 15 Utah 506, 50 P. 611; Klinge v. Southern Pacific Company, 89 Utah 284, 57 P.2d 367, 105 A.L.R. 204. While we agree that the trial court cannot, without any reason whatsoever, grant such a motion upon mere whim or caprice, it nevertheless has a wide latitude of discretion with respect thereto in conformity with the general supervisory powers which it necessarily has over the verdicts of juries in the interest of the administration of justice. If such power is in fact exercised arbitrarily, the proper redress is either in a petition for interlocutory appeal, which may be granted in a proper case (Rule 72(b), U.R.C.P.); or the claimed error can be preserved and reviewed if necessary upon the final outcome of the case. See King v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 117 Utah 40, 212 P.2d 692.

The case is remanded for trial. Costs to defendants (respondents).

HENRIOD, C. J., and McDONOUGH,, CALLISTER, and- WADE, ,JJ„ concur. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 P.2d 736, 15 Utah 2d 185, 1964 Utah LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haslam-v-paulsen-utah-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack