Haslag v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Haslag v. State

206 S.W.3d 376, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1750, 2006 WL 3360951

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2006·No. No. ED 87657·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lucas J. Haslag (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of driving while intoxicated. Defendant claims the court erred in allowing testimony regarding his intoxication because the arresting officer did not have probable cause to stop him.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lucas J. Haslag (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of driving while intoxicated. Defendant claims the court erred in allowing testimony regarding his intoxication because the arresting officer did not have probable cause to stop him.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Haslag v. State, 206 S.W.3d 376, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1750, 2006 WL 3360951 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

206 S.W.3d 376 (Haslag v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.