Haskins v. Snowden

New York Supreme Court

Haskins v. Snowden

2 Johns. Cas. 287

DecidedApril 15, 1801

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 287 (Haskins v. Snowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haskins v. Snowden, 2 Johns. Cas. 287 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1801).

Pincite

Opinion

*Per Curiam.

After receiving notice of bail from the defendant, in propria persona, it was regular to serve the copy of the declaration on him; and the plaintiff was not bound to deliver a new copy and notice to the attorney who was afterwards retained. But as the defendant has made affidavit that he has a good defence on the merits, and no trial has been lost, the default is set aside, on payment of costs.

Rule granted.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*Per Curiam.

After receiving notice of bail from the defendant, in propria persona, it was regular to serve the copy of the declaration on him; and the plaintiff was not bound to deliver a new copy and notice to the attorney who was afterwards retained. But as the defendant has made affidavit that he has a good defence on the merits, and no trial has been lost, the default is set aside, on payment of costs.

Rule granted.(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Johns. Cas. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haskins-v-snowden-nysupct-1801.