Haskins v. Sebor

New York Supreme Court

Haskins v. Sebor

2 Johns. Cas. 217

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1801

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 217 (Haskins v. Sebor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haskins v. Sebor, 2 Johns. Cas. 217 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1801).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the defendant did not apply at the July term, hut has suffered two terms to elapse, since the defendant’s default, he must be considered as having waived the default, and the plaintiff is *freed from his stipulation. This being, then, as it were, the first application, the plaintiff is entitled to a new stipulation; and the motion must be denied.

Rule refused.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As the defendant did not apply at the July term, hut has suffered two terms to elapse, since the defendant’s default, he must be considered as having waived the default, and the plaintiff is *freed from his stipulation. This being, then, as it were, the first application, the plaintiff is entitled to a new stipulation; and the motion must be denied.

Rule refused.(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Johns. Cas. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haskins-v-sebor-nysupct-1801.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack