Haskins v. New Jerusalem Church of God in Christ
This text of Haskins v. New Jerusalem Church of God in Christ (Haskins v. New Jerusalem Church of God in Christ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE
9 ALETA HASKINS, an individual, and NEW NO. 2:24-cv-01709-JHC JERUSALEM CHURCH OF GOD IN 10 CHRIST, a Washington corporation, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND 11 Plaintiffs,
12 v. 13 GUIDEONE INSURANCE, a corporation, 14 Defendant. 15
16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Haskins’s Motion to Remand. Dkt. # 4. The Court has 17 considered all materials filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the rest of the case 18 file, and the governing law. Being fully advised, the Court rules as follows: 19 The Court STRIKES the Amended Complaint at Dkt. # 6. See McGrath v. Home Depot 20 USA, Inc., 298 F.R.D. 601, 607 (S.D. Cal. 2014) (adopting approach of “cases applying 28 21 U.S.C. § 1447(e) to scrutinize the propriety of diversity destroying amendment”). Plaintiff 22 Haskins may timely move to amend the complaint. 23 The Court DENIES the motion to remand without prejudice. 24 / 25 /
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND - 1 ] DATED this 22nd day of November, 2024. 2 3 Che. 4). Chua _ JOHN H. CHUN 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Haskins v. New Jerusalem Church of God in Christ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haskins-v-new-jerusalem-church-of-god-in-christ-wawd-2024.