Haskins v. Moore

1 How. N.P. 17
CourtCircuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan
DecidedJuly 1, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. N.P. 17 (Haskins v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haskins v. Moore, 1 How. N.P. 17 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

By the Court,

Jennison, J.

Mrs. Haskins obtained a verdict of $327 and costs in a slander suit. A few days thereafter parties tried to negotiate a compromise. The result was that a man by the name of Smithson took plaintiff to the house of defendant, where, after some discussion, a discharge in full of the verdict, in consideration of $50, was read to her and signed by her. The money was paid to Smithson with plaintiff’s consent, but it appears that he appropriated it to his own use. Judgment was afterwards entered on verdict, with leave to move to have it set aside. Mr. Palmer made the motion for satisfaction of judgment, based on affidavits. Judge Reilly filed counter affidavits, denying the facts charged.

On this showing, Held, that plaintiff had a right established by law, to wit, a judgment, and that before [18]*18that right could be assailed plaintiff was entitled to have an issue framed and to defend herself by examination of witnesses in due course of law.

Ex-Judge G. J. Reilly for plaintiff. E. Minock and E. Palmer for defendant.

Generally, no matter can be tried upon mere affidavit, except such as depends upon the discretion of the Court.

People Ex Rel. Judge of Calhoun Circuit, 24. Mich, 408.

Motion denied without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. N.P. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haskins-v-moore-micirct3-1881.