Haskins v. Lau's Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Haskins v. Lau's Corp.

410 S.E.2d 460, 201 Ga. App. 4, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1172

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 3, 1991

DocketA90A1788, A90A1789

StatusPublished

This text of 410 S.E.2d 460 (Haskins v. Lau's Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haskins v. Lau's Corp., 410 S.E.2d 460, 201 Ga. App. 4, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant-plaintiffs in these companion cases were robbed and seriously injured in the parking lot of appellee-defendant’s restaurant. Appellants brought suit, alleging that appellee had negligently failed to provide adequate warning or adequate security for its patrons. Appellants appealed to this court from the trial court’s grant of appellee’s motion for summary judgment and we reversed. Haskins v. Lau’s Corp., 198 Ga. App. 470 (402 SE2d 58) (1991). On certiorari, however, the Supreme Court reversed our decision. Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991). Accordingly, our original judgment of reversal is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court and the order of the trial court [5]*5granting summary judgment in favor of appellee is hereby affirmed.

Decided September 3, 1991. Dozier, Akin, Lee & Graham, L. Z. Dozier, Jr., for appellants. Bentley, Karesh, Seacrest, Labovitz & Campbell, Edwin A. Tate II, Jean F. Johnson, for appellee.

Judgments affirmed.

Sognier, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley, Judge.

Appellant-plaintiffs in these companion cases were robbed and seriously injured in the parking lot of appellee-defendant’s restaurant. Appellants brought suit, alleging that appellee had negligently failed to provide adequate warning or adequate security for its patrons. Appellants appealed to this court from the trial court’s grant of appellee’s motion for summary judgment and we reversed. Haskins v. Lau’s Corp., 198 Ga. App. 470 (402 SE2d 58) (1991). On certiorari, however, the Supreme Court reversed our decision. Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991). Accordingly, our original judgment of reversal is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court and the order of the trial court [5]*5granting summary judgment in favor of appellee is hereby affirmed.

Decided September 3, 1991. Dozier, Akin, Lee & Graham, L. Z. Dozier, Jr., for appellants. Bentley, Karesh, Seacrest, Labovitz & Campbell, Edwin A. Tate II, Jean F. Johnson, for appellee.

Judgments affirmed.

Sognier, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

410 S.E.2d 460, 201 Ga. App. 4, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haskins-v-laus-corp-gactapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack