Haskins v. Clements

116 S.E. 594, 155 Ga. 283, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 53
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1923·No. No. 3146·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The original petition as amended did not allege a cause of action for setting aside the verdict and judgment complained of; and consequently the trial judge erred, while passing upon the law .and facts without a jury, in rendering such a judgment.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haskins v. Clements, 116 S.E. 594, 155 Ga. 283, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 53 (Ga. 1923).

116 S.E. 594 (Haskins v. Clements) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Storey v. Weaver
66 Ga. 296 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)
Phillips v. Taber
10 S.E. 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)
Short v. Mathis
28 S.E. 918 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Tucker v. Roberts
108 S.E. 222 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)