Haskins v. Clements

116 S.E. 594, 155 Ga. 283, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 53
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1923
DocketNo. 3146
StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 594 (Haskins v. Clements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haskins v. Clements, 116 S.E. 594, 155 Ga. 283, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 53 (Ga. 1923).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The original petition as amended did not allege a cause of action for setting aside the verdict and judgment complained of; and consequently the trial judge erred, while passing upon the law .and facts without a jury, in rendering such a judgment.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Storey v. Weaver
66 Ga. 296 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)
Phillips v. Taber
10 S.E. 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)
Short v. Mathis
28 S.E. 918 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Tucker v. Roberts
108 S.E. 222 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 594, 155 Ga. 283, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haskins-v-clements-ga-1923.