Haskett v. Small

16 Ind. 81, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 20
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 1861·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only questions in this case arise upon the rulings on instructions.

Those given, although erroneous as to the appellant, upon a state of facts which might be supposéd, yet as they were more favorable to him than he could have asked upon another state of facts which might have existed, we can not disturb the judgment, the evidence not being in the record.

The instruction asked by the appellant was properly refused, on the ground that it left the jury to measure the damages from their opinion of the value of an article, without reference to the proof on that point.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haskett v. Small, 16 Ind. 81, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 20 (Ind. 1861).

16 Ind. 81 (Haskett v. Small) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ohio Electric Co. v. Evans
134 N.E. 519 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)
City of Lafayette v. Larson
73 Ind. 367 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)