Haskell v. House

5 S.C.L. 242
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 S.C.L. 242 (Haskell v. House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haskell v. House, 5 S.C.L. 242 (S.C. 1812).

Opinion

Nott, J.

The will in this case gives the executors a bare, naked authority ; they have no interest in the-land itself. Until they exercise their power, therefore, it descends to the heirs. Co. Lit. 236. a. The will does not even authprise them to bring suit for the land; they were obliged to make use of the names of the heirs. I am of opinion, therefore, that the nonsuit should be set aside.

The other judges concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dubose v. Kell
89 S.E. 555 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 S.C.L. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haskell-v-house-sc-1812.