Haskell v. Haskell
24 N.E. 859, 152 Mass. 16, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 9
Opinion
We know of no absolute rule of law that the father is entitled to the custody of the children when he obtains a divorce from the bonds of matrimony on the ground of bigamy [17] and adultery committed by the wife. We see no error of law in the exceptions. Whether the justice who tried the libel, in view of all the facts appearing at the trial, exercised a sound discretion is a question not before us. See Oliver v. Oliver, 151 Mass. 349. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haskell v. Haskell, 24 N.E. 859, 152 Mass. 16, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 9 (Mass. 1890).
24 N.E. 859 (Haskell v. Haskell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fort v. Fort
425 N.E.2d 754 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)
Clifford v. Clifford
238 N.E.2d 522 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1968)
Guardianship of Casad
234 P.2d 647 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)
Sakraida v. Sakraida
233 P.2d 762 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1951)
Bergeron v. Bergeron
192 N.E. 86 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Richards v. Forrest
180 N.E. 508 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Swoyer v. Swoyer
145 A. 190 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1929)
Cooke v. Cooke
248 P. 83 (Utah Supreme Court, 1926)
State v. Ward
61 Vt. 153 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1888)