Hasinger v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Hasinger v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance

117 Pa. Super. 475

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 15, 1935

DocketAppeal No. 92

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 117 Pa. Super. 475 (Hasinger v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hasinger v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance, 117 Pa. Super. 475 (Pa. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment was entered in the court below against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of assumpsit. The action was brought by certain members of St. Bernard’s Boman Catholic Church, an unincorporated association, on its behalf, to recover the return or unearned premium due the church on the cancellation of a fire insurance policy covering the church property which had been issued by the defendant insurance company.

The action was not brought to recover a loss under the policy, but for the return or unearned premium payable on its cancellation. It was not necessary to append a copy of the policy to the plaintiff’s statement.

The opinion of Judge Patterson of the court below clearly and concisely states the facts involved and the law applicable to the case.

The judgment is affirmed on that opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI