Hasinger v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance

117 Pa. Super. 475
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1935·No. Appeal No. 92·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment was entered in the court below against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of assumpsit. The action was brought by certain members of St. Bernard’s Boman Catholic Church, an unincorporated association, on its behalf, to recover the return or unearned premium due the church on the cancellation of a fire insurance policy covering the church property which had been issued by the defendant insurance company.

The action was not brought to recover a loss under the policy, but for the return or unearned premium payable on its cancellation. It was not necessary to append a copy of the policy to the plaintiff’s statement.

The opinion of Judge Patterson of the court below clearly and concisely states the facts involved and the law applicable to the case.

The judgment is affirmed on that opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hasinger v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance, 117 Pa. Super. 475 (Pa. Ct. App. 1935).

117 Pa. Super. 475 (Hasinger v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hocker v. Thomson
2 Pa. D. & C.2d 95 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1953)
Wolfson v. Gicas
88 Pa. D. & C. 145 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1953)
Commuters' Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
88 A.2d 420 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)