Hash v. Giacomazzi

• Court: District Court, N.D. California
• Decided: April 5, 2023
• Docket: 5:20-cv-01116
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAWRENCE G. HASH, 7 Case No. 20-cv-01116 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, 8 ORDER OF SERVICE ON NEWLY IDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS; v. 9 DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR 10 NOTICE REGARDING SUCH M. GIACOMAZZI, et al., MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO 11 CLERK Defendants.

13 14 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 15 U.S.C. § 1983 against numerous prison staff at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) and 16 other individuals. The amended complaint is the operative complaint in this matter. Dkt. 17 Nos. 15, 15-1. The Court instructed Plaintiff to file a supplemental pleading to identify the 18 appropriate SHO (senior hearing officer) who presided over the final disciplinary hearing 19 regarding the five RVRs at issue in Plaintiff’s due process claim. Dkt. No. 28 at 15; Dkt. 20 No. 54 at 5. Plaintiff filed a supplemental pleading. Dkt. No. 55. The Court will order the 21 matter served on the identified SHOs for each of the 5 Rules Violations Reports which are 22 the subject of this action. 23 24 DISCUSSION 25 A. SHOs 26 Claims 1 and 2 of the amended complaint challenged the following five RVRs: (1) 27 RVR-log #4671; (2) RVR-log #4973; (3) RVR-log #6610; (4) RVR-log #6611; and (5) 1 additional RVR, Log No. 4690, which involves possession of a deadly weapon.1 Dkt. No. 2 63 at 2. Because Log No. 4690 is not the subject of this litigation, the Court will disregard 3 it here. 4 The Court will order the matter served on the SHOs identified in the five RVRs 5 relevant to this action: (1) B. Walls (SHO for RVRs #4671 and #4973); (2) D. Spurgeon 6 (SHO for RVR #6610); and B. Haub (SHO for RVR #6611). 7 8 CONCLUSION 9 For the foregoing reasons, the Court orders as follows: 10 1. The following defendants at SQSP shall be served: 11 a. Lt. B. Walls 12 b. Lt. D. Spurgeon 13 c. Lt. B. Haub 14 Service on the listed defendant(s) shall proceed under the California Department of 15 Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR) e-service program for civil rights cases from 16 prisoners in CDCR custody. In accordance with the program, the clerk is directed to serve 17 on CDCR via email the following documents: the operative complaint and any attachments 18 thereto, (Dkt. Nos. 15, 15-1), this order of service, a copy of the court orders filed under 19 Docket Nos. 28 and 54, and a CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver form. The clerk also 20 shall serve a copy of this order on the plaintiff. 21 No later than 40 days after service of this order via email on CDCR, CDCR shall 22 provide the court a completed CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver advising the court which 23 defendant(s) listed in this order will be waiving service of process without the need for 24 service by the United States Marshal Service (USMS) and which defendant(s) decline to 25 waive service or could not be reached. CDCR also shall provide a copy of the CDCR 26 Report of E-Service Waiver to the California Attorney General’s Office which, within 21 27 1 days, shall file with the court a waiver of service of process for the defendant(s) who are 2 waiving service. 3 Upon receipt of the CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver, the clerk shall prepare for 4 each defendant who has not waived service according to the CDCR Report of E-Service 5 Waiver a USM-205 Form. The clerk shall provide to the USMS the completed USM-205 6 forms and copies of this order, the summons and the operative complaint for service upon 7 each defendant who has not waived service. The clerk also shall provide to the USMS a 8 copy of the CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver. 9 2. No later than ninety-one (91) days from the date this order is filed, 10 Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with 11 respect to the claims in the complaint found to be cognizable above. 12 a. Any motion for summary judgment shall be supported by adequate 13 factual documentation and shall conform in all respects to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of 14 Civil Procedure. Defendants are advised that summary judgment cannot be granted, nor 15 qualified immunity found, if material facts are in dispute. If any Defendant is of the 16 opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the 17 Court prior to the date the summary judgment motion is due. 18 b. In the event Defendants file a motion for summary judgment, the 19 Ninth Circuit has held that Plaintiff must be concurrently provided the appropriate 20 warnings under Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 963 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). See 21 Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 940 (9th Cir. 2012). 22 3. Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court 23 and served on Defendants no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date Defendants’ 24 motion is filed. 25 Plaintiff is also advised to read Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 26 Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (holding party opposing summary judgment 27 must come forward with evidence showing triable issues of material fact on every essential 1 || Defendants’ motion for summary judgment may be deemed to be a consent by Plaintiff to 2 || the granting of the motion, and granting of judgment against Plaintiff without a trial. See 3 || Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam); Brydges v. Lewis, 18 4 || F.3d 651, 653 (9th Cir. 1994). 5 4. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after 6 || Plaintiff's opposition is filed. 7 5. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. 8 || No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date. 9 6. All communications by the Plaintiff with the Court must be served on 10 || Defendants, or Defendants’ counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true 11 || copy of the document to Defendants or Defendants’ counsel. 12 7. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil E 13 || Procedure. No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local 14 || Rule 16-1 is required before the parties may conduct discovery. 3 15 8. It is Plaintiffs responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the 16 || court informed of any change of address and must comply with the court’s orders in a i 17 || timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to 18 prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 19 9. Extensions of time must be filed no later than the deadline sought to be 20 || extended and must be accompanied by a showing of good cause. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 || Dated: April 5, 2023 aM EDWARD J. DAVILA 23 United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28