Hash v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided April 26, 2023·No. 3:21-cv-01374·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

TAMMY HASH, 3:21-cv-01374-SB Plaintiff, Vs. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $4,182.97 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the fees shall be delivered via electronic funds transfer or by check made out to Plaintiffs attorney and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney’s office! as follows: NW Disability benefits, LLC dba Kerr Robichaux & Carroll (TID 85-3999428), P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made to Plaintiff and sent via electronic funds transfer or by check mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. DATED this 26t1 day of Apt , 2023. Mon □ SJ anc 7 ONe7 Hon. Stacie F. Beckerman United States Magistrate Judge

' Formerly known as Schneider Kerr & Robichaux.

Submitted by: Kevin Kerr, OSB #080934 kevin.kerr@GetSSD.com Kerr Robichaux & Carroll PO Box 14490 Portland, Oregon 97293 Phone: 503-255-9092 Fax: 503-255-9145 Attorney for Plaintiff

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hash v. Commissioner of Social Security, (D. Or. 2023).

Hash v. Commissioner of Social Security (Hash v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)