Hasenstab v. McGuire

600 N.E.2d 620, 80 N.Y.2d 812, 587 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1787
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (178 AD2d 217).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hasenstab v. McGuire, 600 N.E.2d 620, 80 N.Y.2d 812, 587 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1787 (N.Y. 1992).

600 N.E.2d 620 (Hasenstab v. McGuire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Education v. Christa Construction, Inc.
608 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Bonilla v. New York City Civil Service Commission
186 A.D.2d 64 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)