Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hasemeier v. McDonough

Hasemeier v. McDonough

932 So. 2d 1168, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730, 2006 WL 1763658
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 29, 2006
DocketNo. 1D06-1549
StatusPublished

This text of 932 So. 2d 1168 (Hasemeier v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hasemeier v. McDonough, 932 So. 2d 1168, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730, 2006 WL 1763658 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of May 23, 2006, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is renewable by motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.430 in the appellate proceeding that precipitated the order rather than by separate appeal. Wagner v. McDonough, 930 So.2d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The circuit court’s appellate indigen-cy/lien order is properly challenged by filing a motion for review in case number 1D05-3856.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wagner v. McDonough
930 So. 2d 710 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
932 So. 2d 1168, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10730, 2006 WL 1763658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hasemeier-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.