Haselton v. Monroe

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Haselton v. Monroe

18 N.H. 598

DecidedDecember 15, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 18 N.H. 598 (Haselton v. Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haselton v. Monroe, 18 N.H. 598 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilchrist, J.

The demurrer must prevail. The debtor who has been summoned as trustee for the whole amount which he owes the party made defendant in the trustee suit, cannot, while he remains liable to be charged in that suit, be called on by his creditor. This was said in Burnham v. Folsom, 5 N. H. Rep. 568, and is the language of the cases there cited, and of a still earlier one in Calthrop’s Cases under the Customs of London 33, Haydon v. Shink.

Judgment for the defendant on the demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilchrist, J.

The demurrer must prevail. The debtor who has been summoned as trustee for the whole amount which he owes the party made defendant in the trustee suit, cannot, while he remains liable to be charged in that suit, be called on by his creditor. This was said in Burnham v. Folsom, 5 N. H. Rep. 568, and is the language of the cases there cited, and of a still earlier one in Calthrop’s Cases under the Customs of London 33, Haydon v. Shink.

Judgment for the defendant on the demurrer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 N.H. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haselton-v-monroe-nhsuperct-1847.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack