Hasbrouck v. Vandervoort

1 Seld. Notes 185
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 1853·Published

Opinion

A husband is not a competent witness for or against the trustee of his wife’s separate estate in a suit between the trustee and a third person in relation to the trust estate.

The principle which excludes the testimony of husband or wife, where the other is a party, or interested in the suit, depends merely upon the relations existing between the witness and party, and not at all upon the interest of the witness in the event of the suit. It is not, therefore, affected by sections 398 and 399 of the Code of Procedure.

(S. C., 4 Sandf. 596; 9 N. Y. 153.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hasbrouck v. Vandervoort, 1 Seld. Notes 185 (N.Y. 1853).

1 Seld. Notes 185 (Hasbrouck v. Vandervoort) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hasbrouck v. . Vandervoort and Hayward
9 N.Y. 153 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)