Hasan, Zafar v. Foley & Lardner LLP
This text of Hasan, Zafar v. Foley & Lardner LLP (Hasan, Zafar v. Foley & Lardner LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
January 21, 2009
Before
JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge
KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
No. 07‐3025
ZAFAR HASAN, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Plaintiff‐Appellant, District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
v. No. 04 C 5690
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, James B. Zagel, Judge.
Defendant‐Appellee.
O R D E R
The Motion for Leave to Intervene and Petition for Rehearing is treated as a motion by a non‐party to correct the opinion.
The motion is granted. The second sentence of Page 13, “Part B,” is amended to read:
Those facts include Simon’s anti‐Muslim comments, Hagerman’s advice, Mason’s warning to Jaspan about Mr. Hasan’s religion, the suspicious timing of the downturn in his hours and evaluations following September 11, one partner’s No. 07-3025 Page 2
testimony that Foley fired no other associates for economic reasons and did well financially in 2001 and 2002, the Business Law Department’s treatment of its other Muslim associates and Foley’s shifting justifications for firing Mr. Hasan.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hasan, Zafar v. Foley & Lardner LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hasan-zafar-v-foley-lardner-llp-ca7-2009.