Hasan Yacoub v. Rubbertop USA, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 21, 2025
Docket01-25-00194-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Hasan Yacoub v. Rubbertop USA, LLC (Hasan Yacoub v. Rubbertop USA, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hasan Yacoub v. Rubbertop USA, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 21, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00194-CV ——————————— HASAN YACOUB, Appellant V. RUBBERTOP USA, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1231192

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Hasan Yacoub, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the

trial court’s February 5, 2025 final judgment. Appellant has neither paid the required

fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX.

R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts

of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On April 10, 2025, appellant was notified that

this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence

was not established, by May 12, 2025. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant

did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On April 11, 2025,

appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not

submit written evidence that appellant had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee

for the preparation of the clerk’s record by May 12, 2025. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hasan Yacoub v. Rubbertop USA, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hasan-yacoub-v-rubbertop-usa-llc-texapp-2025.